論刑事訴訟中的證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任

論刑事訴訟中的證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任

摘    要

    證明責(zé)任是刑事訴訟證明理論的核心部分，但長期以來，學(xué)界往往將證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任混為1談。通過對證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任這兩個概念進(jìn)行辨析，分析證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任各自的分配原則及責(zé)任承擔(dān)主體，有利于完善和豐富刑事訴訟證明理論。

關(guān)鍵詞： 刑事訴訟； 證明責(zé)任； 舉證責(zé)任； 相互關(guān)系； 責(zé)任主體

ABSTRACT
  
Proved the responsibility is the core that proved the theory of the criminal prosecution. But since long ago, academic circles think proves the responsibility and presents evidence the responsibility are the same concept. Compared with proved the responsibility and presents evidence the responsibility these two concepts, the analysis proved the responsibility and presents evidence the responsibility respective assignment principle and the responsibility undertakes the main body. This is advantageous to being perfect and the rich criminal prosecution proves the theory.

Key words:  Criminal prosecution; Proves the responsibility; Presents evidence the responsibility; Reciprocity; Responsibility main body

..............................
注：【包括：畢業(yè)論文，任務(wù)書，開題報告】

【論刑事訴訟中的證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任】相關(guān)文章：

試論民事訴訟中的舉證責(zé)任06-07

試論民事訴訟中舉證責(zé)任的承擔(dān)05-05

淺談行政訴訟中原告的舉證責(zé)任06-03

淺談我國刑事訴訟中的申訴06-02

刑事司法正義論06-05

論民事訴訟中的審判監(jiān)視程序06-03

論民事盜竊與刑事盜竊的區(qū)分06-06

公道疑點與疑點排除-兼論刑事訴訟證實責(zé)任的分配理論06-03

論研究刑事上訴審程序的意義06-12

我國刑事訴訟中管轄權(quán)異議制度建立設(shè)想06-08