目前的新SAT考試部分雖然新SAT寫作部分已經是選考的題目，但是我們仍然不能忽視和松懈，因為很多美國的名校還是需要新SAT寫作成績的。下面是小編為大家整理收集的關于新SAT作文總分算分規則的相關介紹，希望對大家有所幫助。
1、新SAT作文怎么考?
作文部分有50分鐘時間完成，是對議論文的分析性寫作�？忌乳喿x一篇650-750單詞的文章，然后分析文章當中用了哪些依據，如何運用這些依據去證明作者的觀點。作文從閱讀、分析和寫作三個方面來打分，每個部分滿分4分，分別考察考生對于文章的理解，對于文中相關內容的分析，以及寫作的結構和語言能力。那么我們在SAT考試培訓教學和學習中也應該從這三個方面去準備。上海美盟SAT培訓中心以分析新SAT官方指南的中的一道作文題以及一篇滿分范文進行解析，看看作文部分到底應該如何備考。
2、新SAT作文算分規則
算分規則
改革后的SAT作文依然會由兩位閱卷人評判。每位閱卷人將以1-4分來分別評閱考生作文中的閱讀、分析和寫作三個維度。每個維度的得分分別相加后都會在2-8分區間內。例如，經兩位閱卷人評閱后，一位考生的閱讀、分析和寫作三個方面的得分分別為3-2-3和3-2-3，最終將三個維度內分數分別相加后，考生的作文得分為6-4-6，即閱讀維度得分6分，分析維度得分4分，寫作維度得分6分。
選取官方提供的學生作文樣本供大家參考。下面的作文在一位閱卷老師審閱后，得分為3/2/3，即閱讀3分，分析2分，寫作3分。
Sample Student Essay: 3/2/3
In the article “Why literature matters” (2005) Dana Gioia expresses that American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read. He argues that intellectual abilities are decreacing. Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level. He targets everyone essentially as his audience.
Gioia expresses reasoning in paragraph five when he states that the decline in reading will lead to consequences and people will have a lower set of mental skills. He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional ability....to craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read. This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents.
Gioia also includes fACTs and statistics in paragraph six in order to capture the audience’s attention so they realize that the intellectual state of peoples minds is ACTually dropping. He states, “poor reading skills ranked second, 38 percent of employers complained that local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension.” Gioia inserts this statistic to grab people’s attention, such as people who teach in schools so that we are sure that children have good reading comprehension at an early age.
Finally Gioia displays proper word choice throughout the text to express the fACT that having good reading comprehension will broaden your vocabulary. He uses the word intellectual multiple times for effect. Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society.
Gioia’s goal is to reach out to his audience and to encourage them to read, and apply their intellectual abilities to their everyday life. He has a sense of hope that people will express their abilities to grow and be fruitful with their social encounters.
This paper scored a 3/2/3.
Reading—3: This response demonstrates effective comprehension of Gioia’s text. The writer provides appropriate textual evidence (paraphrases and quotations) to capture both the main ideas of the passage (American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read and intellectual abilities are decreacing) and important details (He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional ability....to craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read). There are no substantive errors of fACT or interpretation in this essay. On the whole, the writer demonstrates a complete understanding of Gioia’s argument, especially the relationship between declining literary reading and social awareness (or social encounters). Overall, this response demonstrates proficient reading comprehension.
Analysis—2: The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of the analytical task and offers only a partial analysis of how Gioia builds his argument. The writer identifies some analytical elements of Gioia’s text (such as reasoning, fACTs, and word choice) and attempts to describe how these elements function in the passage. However, throughout the response, the writer provides only single assertions about elements of argumentation in Gioia’s text (This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents). Instances of analysis, most commonly found at the end of paragraphs, illustrate some understanding on the writer’s part of how Gioia builds his argument; however, the writer does not move beyond providing assertions into effective discussion or evaluation of how evidence, reasoning, or stylistic and persuasive elements are used to build the argument. Overall, this response demonstrates only partially successful analysis.
Writing—3: This response is mostly cohesive and demonstrates broadly effective use and control of language. Starting with an effective introductory paragraph that includes a clear central claim (Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level), the writer structures his essay clearly, if formulaically, around the three points of reasoning, evidence, and word choice. Each paragraph remains on-topic, and there is a clear progression of ideas within paragraphs and across the essay as a whole. The response maintains a formal style and objective tone while demonstrating a variety of sentence structures. Although sentence structures are occasionally awkward (Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society), language errors do not detrACT significantly from the quality of writing. Overall, this response demonstrates proficient writing.