GMAT考試優秀作文范文
This newspaper editorial concludes that our city should build a plant for burning trash in order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills. The author adds that an incinerator could offer economic benefits as well, since incinerators can be adapted to generate small amounts of electricity for other uses, and since ash residue from some kinds of trash can be used as a soil conditioner. Even if these claims are true, the authors argument is unconvincing in three important respects.
To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash. It is possible, for example, that respiratory problems resulting from the air pollution caused by burning trash might be so extensive that they would outweigh the health risks associated with landfills. If so, the authors conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
Secondly, the author assumes that discontinuing landfill operations would abate the heath threats they now pose. However, this is not necessarily the case. It is possible that irreversible environmental damage to subterranean water supplies, for example, has already occurred. In this event, changing from landfills to incinerators might not avoid or abate serious public health problems.
【GMAT考試優秀作文范文】相關文章：
普通話考試優秀說話范文201705-02
2017年普通話考試說話優秀范文05-02
2017年普通話考試說話范文優秀01-17
BEC商務英語高級考試的優秀作文04-22
普通話考試說話范文考試技巧03-25
普通話考試范文04-29
英語職稱考試滿分范文01-20
優秀班長簡歷范文08-05
個人優秀簡歷范文01-15
求職簡歷優秀范文08-23