GMAT備考優秀作文精選
The author of this article argues that the country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade deficit problem by lowering the price of its main export, sugar. The line of reasoning is that this action would make Sacchar more competitive with other sugar-exporting countries, thereby increasing sales of Sacchars sugar abroad and, in turn, substantially reducing the trade-deficit. This line of reasoning is unconvincing for a couple of reasons.
In the first place, this argument is based on an oversimplified analysis of the trade deficit problem Sacchar currently faces. A trade-deficit occurs when a country spends more on imports than it earns from exports. The authors argument relies on the assumption that earnings from imports will remain constant. However, the author provides no evidence that substantiates this assumption. It is possible that revenues from imports will increase dramatically in the near future; if so, the course of action proposed by the author might be unnecessary to solve Sacchars trade deficit problem. Conversely, it is possible that revenues from imports are likely to decrease dramatically in the near future. To the extent that this is the case, lowering sugar prices may have a negligible countervailing effect, depending on the demand for Sacchars sugar.
【GMAT備考優秀作文精選】相關文章：
GMAT優秀作文備考精選10-03
GMAT優秀備考作文精選07-23
備考GMAT優秀作文精選07-22
備考資料GMAT優秀作文精選10-06
備考資料：GMAT優秀作文精選09-29
GMAT優秀作文精選備考資料07-21
GMAT備考優秀作文09-20
備考GMAT優秀作文09-19
GMAT優秀備考范文精選07-21