• <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"></ol></sub>
    <sup id="h4knl"></sup>
      <sub id="h4knl"></sub>

      <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"><em id="h4knl"></em></ol></sub><s id="h4knl"></s>
      1. <strong id="h4knl"></strong>

      2. 備考資料:GMAT優秀

        時間:2021-01-11 16:21:00 gmat考試 我要投稿

        備考資料:GMAT優秀范文精選

          為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

        備考資料:GMAT優秀范文精選

          The author of Perks Companys business plan recommends that funds currently spent on the employee benefits package be redirected to either upgrade plant machinery or build an additional plant. The author reasons that offering employees a generous package of benefits and incentives year after year is no longer cost-effective given current high unemployment rates, and that Perks can attract and keep good employees without such benefits and incentives. While this argument has some merit, its line of reasoning requires close examination.

          To begin with, the author relies on the reasoning that it is unnecessary to pay relatively high wages during periods of high unemployment because the market will supply many good employees at lower rates of pay. While this reasoning may be sound in a general sense, the particular industry that Perks is involved in may not be representative of unemployment levels generally. It is possible that relatively few unemployed people have the type of qualifications that match job openings at Perks, if this is the case, the claim that it is easier now to attract good employees at lower wages is ill-founded.

          Secondly, the argument relies on the assumption that the cost-effectiveness of a wage policy is determined solely by whatever wages a market can currently bear. This assumption overlooks the peripheral costs of reducing or eliminating benefits. For example, employee morale is likely to decline if Perks eliminates benefits; as a result, some employees could become less productive, and others might quit. Even if Perks can readily replace those employees, training costs and lower productivity associated with high turnover may outweigh any advantages of redirecting funds to plant construction. Moreover, because the recommended reduction in benefits is intended to fund the retrofitting of an entire plant or the building of a new one, the reduction would presumably be a sizable one; consequently, the turnover costs associated with the reduction might be very high indeed.

        《&.doc》
        将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便收藏和打印
        推荐度:
        点击下载文档

        【備考資料:GMAT優秀范文精選】相關文章:

        備考資料GMAT優秀作文范文08-05

        備考資料:GMAT優秀作文范文01-28

        備考資料:GMAT優秀作文范文07-24

        備考資料GMAT優秀作文精選08-06

        備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選08-03

        GMAT優秀作文精選備考資料07-21

        備考資料之GMAT優秀作文精選范文07-23

        精選備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選08-06

        備考資料GMAT優秀作文01-29

        国产高潮无套免费视频_久久九九兔免费精品6_99精品热6080YY久久_国产91久久久久久无码
      3. <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"></ol></sub>
        <sup id="h4knl"></sup>
          <sub id="h4knl"></sub>

          <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"><em id="h4knl"></em></ol></sub><s id="h4knl"></s>
          1. <strong id="h4knl"></strong>

          2. 亚洲一区二区三区97 | 亚洲国产综合专区在线播放 | 婷婷中文字幕一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区中文在线 | 久久人人人人玩人爽精品 | 思思精品久久96 |

            備考資料:GMAT優秀范文精選

              為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

            備考資料:GMAT優秀范文精選

              The author of Perks Companys business plan recommends that funds currently spent on the employee benefits package be redirected to either upgrade plant machinery or build an additional plant. The author reasons that offering employees a generous package of benefits and incentives year after year is no longer cost-effective given current high unemployment rates, and that Perks can attract and keep good employees without such benefits and incentives. While this argument has some merit, its line of reasoning requires close examination.

              To begin with, the author relies on the reasoning that it is unnecessary to pay relatively high wages during periods of high unemployment because the market will supply many good employees at lower rates of pay. While this reasoning may be sound in a general sense, the particular industry that Perks is involved in may not be representative of unemployment levels generally. It is possible that relatively few unemployed people have the type of qualifications that match job openings at Perks, if this is the case, the claim that it is easier now to attract good employees at lower wages is ill-founded.

              Secondly, the argument relies on the assumption that the cost-effectiveness of a wage policy is determined solely by whatever wages a market can currently bear. This assumption overlooks the peripheral costs of reducing or eliminating benefits. For example, employee morale is likely to decline if Perks eliminates benefits; as a result, some employees could become less productive, and others might quit. Even if Perks can readily replace those employees, training costs and lower productivity associated with high turnover may outweigh any advantages of redirecting funds to plant construction. Moreover, because the recommended reduction in benefits is intended to fund the retrofitting of an entire plant or the building of a new one, the reduction would presumably be a sizable one; consequently, the turnover costs associated with the reduction might be very high indeed.