大學英語六級考試模擬訓練試題

2017大學英語六級考試模擬訓練試題

　　從2007年1月起，英語六級考試就不再接受非在校生報名，意味著大家想要考試只能是在校期間參加。為了幫助大家備考2017年大學英語六級考試，小編整理了一些大學英語六級考試模擬試題，希望能對大家有所幫助!

　　Part I Writing (30 minutes)

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write an essay commenting on the saying"Knowledge is a treasure, but practice is the key to it. " You can give an example or two to illustrate your point of view. You should write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words.

　　注意：此部分試題請在答題卡1上作答。

　　Part III Reading Comprehension (40 minutes)

　　Section A

　　Directions: In this section, there is a passage with ten blanks. You are required to select one word for each blank from a list of choices given in a word bank following the passage. Read the passage through carefully before making your choices. Each choice in the bank is identified by a letter. Please mark the corresponding letter for each item on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre. You may not use any of the words in the bank more than once.

　　Questions 36 to 45 are based on the following passage.

　　"That which does not kill us makes us stronger." But parents can't handle it when teenagers put this 36 into practice. Now technology has become the new field for the age-old battle between adults

　　en adults and their freedom-seeking kids.

　　Locked indoors, unable to get on their bicycles and hang out with their friends, teens have turned to social media and their mobile phones to socialize with their peers. What they do online often 37what they might otherwise do if their mobility weren't so heavily .38 in the age of helicopter parenting. Social media and smart-phone apps have become so popular in recent years because teens need a place to call their own. They want the freedom to 39 their identity and the world around them.

　　Instead of 40 out, they jump online.

　　As teens have moved online, parents have projected their fears onto the Internet, imagining all the41 dangers that youth might face--from 42 strangers to cruel peers to pictures or words that could haunt them on Google for the rest of their lives.

　　Rather than helping teens develop strategies for negotiating public life and the risks of 43 with others, fearful parents have focused on tracking, monitoring and blocking. These tactics (策略) don't help teens develop the skills they need to manage complex social situations,44 risks and get help

　　when they're in trouble. "Protecting" kids may feel like the right thing to do, but it 45 the learning that teens need to do as they come of age in a technology-soaked world.

　　注意：此部分試題請在答題卡2上作答。

　　A. assess

　　B.constrained

　　C.contains

　　D.explore

　　E.influence

　　F.interacting

　　G.interpretation

　　H.magnified

　　I. mirrors

　　J.philosophy

　　K.potential

　　L.sneaking

　　M.sticking

　　N. undermines

　　O. violent

　　Section B

　　Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived. You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2.

　　Inequality Is Not Inevitable

　　A) A dangerous trend has developed over this past third of a century. A country that experienced shared growth after World War Ⅱ began to tear apart, so much so that when the Great Recession hit in late 2007, one could no longer ignore the division that had come to define the American economic landscape. How did this "shining city on a hill" become the advanced country with the greatest level of inequality?

　　B) Over the past year and a half, The Great Divide, a series in The New York Times, has presented a wide range of examples that undermine the notion that there are any truly fundamental laws of capitalism. The dynamics of the imperial capitalism of the 19th century needn't apply in the democracies of the 21st. We don't need to have this much inequality in America.

　　C) Our current brand of capitalism is a fake capitalism. For proof of this go back to our response to the Great Recession, where we socialized losses, even as we privatized gains. Perfect competition should drive profits to zero, at least theoretically, but we have monopolies making persistently high profits. C. E. O. s enjoy incomes that are on average 295 times that of the typical worker, amuch higher ratio han in the past, without any evidence of a proportionate increase in productivity.

　　D)If it is not the cruel laws of economics that have led to America's great divide, what is it? The straightforward answer., our policies and our politics. People get tired of hearing about Scandinavian success stories, but the fact of the matter is that Sweden, Finland and Norway have all succeeded in having about as much or faster growth in per capita (人均的 ) incomes than the United States and with far greater equality.

　　E) So why has America chosen these inequality-enhancing policies? Part of the answer is that as World War Ⅱ faded into memory, so too did the solidarity it had created. As America triumphed in the Cold War, there didn't seem to be a real competitor to our economic model. Without this internat~ competition, we no longer had to show that our system could deliver for most of our citizens.

　　F) Ideology and interests combined viciously. Some drew the wrong lesson from the collapse of the Soviet system in 1991. The pendulum swung from much too much government there to much too little here. Corporate interests argued for getting rid of regulations, even when those regulations had done so much to protect and improve our environment, our safety, our health and the economy itself.

　　G) But this ideology was hypocritical (虛偽的). The bankers, among the strongest advocates of laissez- faire (自由放任的 ) economics, were only too willing to accept hundreds of billions of dollars from the government in the aid programs that have been a recurring feature of the global economy since the beginning of the Thatcher-Reagan era of "free" markets and deregulation.

　　H) The American political system is overrun by money. Economic inequality translates into political inequality, and political inequality yields increasing economic inequality. So corporate welfare increases as we reduce welfare for the poor. Congress maintains subsidies for rich farmers as we cut back on nutritional support for the needy. Drug companies have been given hundreds of billions of dollars as we limit Medicaid benefits. The banks that brought on the global financial crisis got billions while a tiny bit went to the homeowners and victims of the same banks' predatory (掠奪性的) lending practices. This last decision was particularly foolish. There were alternatives to throwing money at the banks and hoping it would circulate through increased lending.

　　I) Our divisions are deep. Economic and geographic segregation has immunized those at the top from the problems of those down below. Like the kings of ancient times, they have come to perceive their privileged positions essentially as a natural right.

　　J) Our economy, our democracy and our society have paid for these gross inequalities. The true test of an economy is not how much wealth its princes can accumulate in tax havens (庇護所), but how well off the typical citizen is. But average incomes are lower than they were a quarter-century ago. Growth has gone to the very, very top, whose share has almost increased four times since 1980. Money that was meant to have trickled (流淌) down has instead evaporated in the agreeable climate of the Cayman Islands.

　　K) With almost a quarter of American children younger than 5 living in poverty, and with America doing so little for its poor, the deprivations of one generation are being visited upon the next. Of course, no country has ever come close to providing complete equality of opportunity. But why is America one of the advanced countries where the life prospects of the young are most sharply determined by the income and education of their parents?

　　L) Among the most bitter stories in The Great Divide were those that portrayed the frustrations of the young, who long to enter our shrinking middle class. Soaring tuitions and declining incomes have resulted in larger debt burdens. Those with only a high school diploma have seen their incomes decline by 13 percent over the past 35 years.

　　M) Where justice is concerned, there is also a huge divide. In the eyes of the rest of the world and a significant part of its own population, mass imprisonment has come to define America--a country, it bears repeating, with about 5 percent of the world's population but around a fourth of the world's prisoners.

　　N) Justice has becom~ a commodity, affordable to only a few. While Wall Street executives used their expensive lawyers to ensure that their ranks were not held accountable for the misdeeds that the crisis in 2008 so graphically revealed, the banks abused our legal system to foreclose (取消贖回權(quán)) on mortgages and eject tenants, some of whom did not even owe money.

　　O) More than a half-century ago, America led the way in advocating for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948. Today, access to health care is among the most universally accepted rights, at least in the advanced countries. America, despite the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, is the exception. In the relief that many felt when the Supreme Court did not overturn the Affordable Care Act, the implications of the decision for Medicaid were not fully appreciated. Obamacare's objective--to ensure that all Americans have access to health care--has been blocked: 24 states have not implemented the expanded Medicaid program, which was the means by which Obamacare was supposed to deliver on its promise to some of the poorest.

　　P) We need not just a new war on poverty but a war to protect the middle class. Solutions to these problems do not have to be novel. Far from it. Making markets act like markets would be a good place to start. We must end the rent-seeking society we have gravitated toward, in which the wealthy obtain profits by manipulating the system.

　　Q) The problem of inequality is not so much a matter of technical economics. It's really a problem of practical politics. Inequality is not just about the top marginal tax rate but also about our children's access to food and the right to justice for all. If we spent more on education, health and infrastructure (基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施), we would strengthen our economy, now and in the future.

　　注意：此部分試題請在答題卡2上作答。

　　46. In theory, free competition is supposed to reduce the margin of profits to the minimum.

　　47. The United States is now characterized by a great division between the rich and the poor.

　　48. America lacked the incentive to care for the majority of its citizens as it found no rival for its economic model.

　　49. The wealthy top have come to take privileges for granted.

　　50. Many examples show the basic laws of imperial capitalism no longer apply in present-day America.

　　51. The author suggests a return to the true spirit of the market.

　　52. A quarter of the world's prisoner population is in America.

　　53. Government regulation in America went from one extreme to the other in the past two decades.

　　54. Justice has become so expensive that only a small number of people like corporate executives can afford it.

　　55. No country in the world so far has been able to provide completely equal opportunities for all.

　　Section C

　　Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A. , B. , C. and D.. You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer sheet with a single line through the centre.

　　Passage One

　　Questions 56 to 60 are based on the following passage.

　　When the right person is holding the right job at the right moment, that person's influence is greatly expanded. That is the position in which Janet Yellen, who is expected to be confirmed as the next chair of the Federal Reserve Bank (FeD. in January, now finds herself. If you believe, as many do, that unemployment is the major economic and social concern of our day, then it is no stretch to think Yellen is the most powerful person in the world right now.

　　Throughout the 2008 financial crisis and the recession and recovery that followed, central banks have taken on the role of stimulators of last resort, holding up the global economy with vast amounts of money in the form of asset buying. Yellen, previously a Fed vice chair, was one of the principal architects of the Fed's $ 3.8 trillion money dump. A star economist known for her groundbreaking work on labor markets, Yellen was a kind of prophetess early on in thc crisis for her warnings about the subprime (次級債) meltdown. Now it will be her job to get the Fed and the markets out of the biggest and most unconventional monetary program in history without derailing the fragile recovery.The good news is that Yellen,67, is particularly well suited to meet these challenges. She has a keen understanding of financial markets, an appreciation for their imperfections and a strong belief that human suffering was more related to unemployment than anything else.

　　Some experts worry that Yellen will be inclined to chase unemployment to the neglect of inflation.

　　But with wages still relatively flat and the economy increasingly divided between the well-off and the long-term unemployed, more people worry about the opposite, deflation (通貨緊縮) that would aggravate the economy's problems.

　　Either way, the incoming Fed chief will have to walk a fine line in slowly ending the stimulus. It must be steady enough to deflate bubbles (去泡沫) and bring markets back down to earth but not so quick thatit creates another credit crisis.

　　Unlike many past Fed leaders, Yellen is not one to buy into the finance industry's argument that itshould be left alone to regulate itself. She knows all along the Fed has been too slack on regulation of finance. Yellen is likely to address the issue right after she pushes unemployment below 6%, stabilizes markets and makes sure that the recovery is more inclusive and robust. As Princeton Professor Alan Blinder says, "She's smart as a whip, deeply logical, willing to argue but also a good listener. She can persuade without creating hostility." All those traits will be useful as the global economy's new power player takes on its most annoying problems.

　　注意：此部分試題請在答題卡2上作答。

　　56. What do many people think is the biggest problem facing Janet Yellen?

　　A. Lack of money.

　　B. Subprime crisis.

　　C. Unemployment.

　　D. Social instability.

　　57. What did Yellen help the Fed do to tackle the 2008 financial crisis?

　　A. Take effective measures to curb inflation.

　　B. Deflate the bubbles in the American economy.

　　C. Formulate policies to help financial institutions.

　　D. Pour money into the market through asset buying.

　　58. What is a greater concern of the general public?

　　A. Recession.

　　B. Deflation.

　　C. Inequality.

　　D. Income.

　　59. What is Yellen likely to do in her position as the Fed chief?

　　A. Develop a new monetary program.

　　B. Restore public confidence.

　　C. Tighten financial regulation.

　　D. Reform the credit system.

　　60. How does Alan Blinder portray Yellen?

　　A. She possesses strong persuasive power.

　　B. She has confidence in what she is doing.

　　C. She is one of the world's greatest economists.

　　D. She is the most powerful Fed chief in history.

　　Passage Two

　　Questions 61 to 65 are based on the following passage.

　　Air pollution is deteriorating in many places around the world. The fact that public parks in cities become crowded as soon as the sun shines proves that people long to breathe in green, open spaces. They do not all know what they are seeking but they flock there, nevertheless. And, in these surroundings, they are generally both peaceful and peaceable. It is rare to see people fighting in a garden. Perhaps struggle unfolds first, not at an economic or social level, but over the appropriation of air, essential to life itself.

　　If human beings can breathe and share air, they don't need to struggle with one another.

　　Unfortunately, in our western tradition, neither materialist nor idealist theoreticians give enough consideration to this basic condition for life. As for politicians, despite proposing curbs on environmental pollution, they have not yet called for it to be made a crime. Wealthy countries are even allowed to pollute if they pay for it.

　　But is our life worth anything other than money? The plant world shows us in silence what faithfulness to life consists of. It also helps us to a new beginning, urging us to care for our breath, not only at a vital but also at a spiritual level. The interdependence to which we must pay the closest attention is that whicl exists between ourselves and the plant world. Often described as "the lungs of the planet", the woods tha cover the earth offer us the gift of breathable air by releasing oxygen. But their capacity to renew the ai polluted by industry has long reached its limit. If we lack the air necessary for a healthy life, it is because we have filled it with chemicals and undercut the ability of plants to regenerate it. As we know, rapi deforestation combined with the massive burning of fossil fuels is an explosive recipe for an irreversibl disaster.

　　The fight over the appropriation of resources will lead the entire planet to hell unless humans learn t share life, both with each other and with plants. This task is simultaneously ethical and political because can be discharged only when each takes it upon herself or himself and only when it is accomplishe together with others. The lesson taught by plants is that sharing life expands and enhances the sphere c the living, while dividing life into so-called natural or human resources diminishes it. We must come t view the air, the plants and ourselves as the contributors to the preservation of life and growth, rathe than a web of quantifiable objects or productive potentialities at our disposal. Perhaps then we woulfinally begin to live, rather than being concerned with bare survival.

　　注意：此部分試題請在答題卡2上作答。

　　61. What does the author assume might be the primary reason that people would struggle with each other

　　A. To get their share of clean air.

　　B. To pursue a comfortable life.

　　C. To gain a higher social status.

　　D. To seek economic benefits.

　　62. What does the author accuse western politicians of?

　　A. Depriving common people of the right to clean air.

　　B. Giving priority to theory rather than practical action.

　　C. Offering preferential treatment to wealthy countries.

　　D. Failing to pass laws to curb environmental pollution.

　　63. What does the author try to draw our closest attention to?

　　A. The massive burning of fossil fuels.

　　B. Our relationship to the plant world.

　　C. The capacity of plants to renew polluted air.

　　D. Large-scale deforestation across the world.

　　64. How can human beings accomplish the goal of protecting the planet according to the author?

　　A. By showing respect for plants.

　　B. By preserving all forms of life.

　　C. By tapping all natural resources.

　　D. By pooling their efforts together.

　　65. What does the author suggest we do in order not just to survive?

　　A. Expand the sphere of living.

　　B. Develop nature's potentials.

　　C. Share life with nature.

　　D. Allocate the resources.

　　Part IV Translation (30 minutes)

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to translate a passage from Chinese into English. You should write your answer on Answer Sheet 2.

　　2011年是中國城市化(urbanization)進程中的歷史性時刻，其城市人口首次超過農(nóng)村人口。在未來20年里，預計約有3.5億農(nóng)村人口將移居到城市。如此規(guī)模的城市發(fā)展對城市交通來說既是挑戰(zhàn)，也是機遇。中國政府一直提倡“以人為本’’的發(fā)展理念，強調(diào)人們以公交而不是私V--$-出行。它還號召建設(shè)“資源節(jié)約和環(huán)境友好型”社會。有了這個明確的目標，中國城市就可以更好地規(guī)劃其發(fā)展，并把大量投資轉(zhuǎn)向安全、清潔和經(jīng)濟型交通系統(tǒng)的發(fā)展上。

　　注意：此部分試題請在答題卡2上作答。

【大學英語六級考試模擬訓練試題】相關(guān)文章：

大學英語六級考試閱讀試題08-17

英語六級考試題型05-18

2017年大學英語六級考試模擬試題06-18

2016年大學英語六級考試試題樣卷06-20

2017年大學英語六級考試考前模擬試題06-19

2017英語六級考試題型分值05-17

2017年大學英語四級模擬訓練試題06-19

大學英語六級考試詞匯06-16

大學英語六級考試攻略05-28